AI Focus Group

Run a live virtual focus group with synthetic personas responding in character

SP
๐Ÿ”’

Free plan โ€” Example only

Upgrade to Pro to run live focus groups with follow-up questions, running summaries, and synthesised reports.

Upgrade
Example OutputSynthPanel Product Concept ยท 8 agents ยท Mixed B2B professionals

SynthPanel โ€” Product Concept Discussion

AI-moderated focus group ยท Real-time sentiment pulse

58%

Positive

29%

Neutral

13%

Negative

Moderator

Welcome everyone. Today we're discussing SynthPanel โ€” an AI research platform. What's your first reaction when you hear 'synthetic personas for market research'?

Priya S.31 ยท Growth Lead, SaaS๐Ÿ˜Š

Honestly? My first reaction was scepticism โ€” but then I thought about how long traditional research takes. If the data is good, this could be transformative. I spend 3 weeks waiting for survey results. 20 minutes sounds incredible.

Marcus T.38 ยท Strategy Consultant๐Ÿ˜

I need to understand the methodology before I'd trust it. How are these personas built? Are they trained on real demographic data? I'd need to see a validation study before presenting outputs to clients.

Yuki N.27 ยท Product Manager๐Ÿ˜Š

I love it. We do so much gut-feel product validation. Having a structured way to test concepts with 10,000 simulated users before building โ€” that's exactly what product teams need. The pricing simulator alone is worth it.

Amara O.44 ยท CMO, Retail๐Ÿ˜

The concept is interesting but I'm worried about echo chambers. If the AI is trained on certain data, won't it just confirm what we already think? I'd want to see how it handles controversial or polarising topics.

Moderator

Marcus, you mentioned methodology โ€” what would a 'validation study' need to show for you to trust the outputs?

Marcus T.38 ยท Strategy Consultant๐Ÿ˜

I'd want to see SynthPanel's outputs compared against real survey data for the same questions. If the synthetic results are within ยฑ5% of real results on key metrics, I'd be convinced. Publish that as a whitepaper and I'd be a customer tomorrow.

Priya S.31 ยท Growth Lead, SaaS๐Ÿ˜Š

That's a fair point. But even if it's directionally right rather than perfectly accurate, it's still 100ร— faster and cheaper than waiting for a real panel. For early-stage validation, directional is good enough.

Emerging Themes

Methodology transparencySpeed vs accuracy trade-offValidation against real dataEcho chamber riskEnterprise trust barriers

Session Insight

The group is broadly receptive but methodology transparency is the #1 barrier to adoption. Publishing a validation study comparing synthetic vs real survey results would directly address the most common objection. The "speed vs accuracy" debate is healthy โ€” lean into it as a positioning narrative: "Directionally right in 20 minutes beats perfectly right in 4 weeks."

Run your own AI Focus Group

Upgrade to Pro to unlock unlimited simulations